Central Scientific Committee Says Sulphur-Cleaning Device in Most Coal Plants ‘Not Necessary’

Breaking News, Daily Updates & Exclusive Stories - asarkari

In a surprising turn of events, India's central scientific committee has declared that the installation of sulphur-cleaning devices, specifically Flue Gas Desulfurization systems (FGDs), is 'not necessary' in the majority of the country's coal-fired power plants. This revelation comes as a critical moment for environmental policies and air quality standards, especially given the serious implications for public health and climate change.

Why FGDs Matter

Flue Gas Desulfurization systems are designed to remove sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions, which are known to contribute to respiratory diseases and environmental degradation. In India, where coal accounts for approximately 70% of electricity generation, these devices are considered paramount in cutting down harmful emissions. Shockingly, a recent report indicates that 92% of India’s 600 coal plant units have not yet installed FGDs.

Panel Recommendations and Population Centers

The committee suggested that 80% of the coal plants, particularly those not located near major population centers, should be exempted from mandatory FGD installation. This recommendation raises significant questions about the prioritization of air quality over industrial productivity, especially as many of these plants are existing commitments to energy generation in rural and less populated areas.

Environmental Concerns and CO2 Emissions

While the committee acknowledged the role of FGDs in reducing short-lived pollutants such as SO2, they raised concerns that these systems might inadvertently lead to an increase in long-lived carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This revelation warrants a thoughtful dialogue regarding the balance between mitigating immediate health risks and the long-term emissions impact on climate change.

Environmentalists have voiced strong objections to the committee’s recommendations, arguing that it contradicts the global commitment to reduce emissions under international climate agreements. The fear is that such exemptions could further compromise air quality and public health, potentially putting millions at risk. The discussion now revolves around whether to prioritize economic concerns over the pressing issue of environmental degradation.

The Bottom Line

The implications of this report are vast and complex. As India continues to expand its energy needs, the balance between reliable electricity production and environmental stewardship will become increasingly pivotal. The scientific committee's recommendations are likely to provoke further debate and scrutiny in both scientific communities and among policymakers. It emphasizes the importance of developing a nuanced, long-term strategy that considers both environmental health and energy resilience.

For more updates on this developing story and to join the conversation on India's energy policies, visit asarkari.com.

Keywords: