UPSC Issue at a Glance | Trump’s 100 days in White House : Greenland, Gulf of Mexico, WHO Exit, and Reciprocal tariffs – All you need to know

Asarkari - Sarkari News, Jobs & Updates

By Meera Patel

kam sabdo me kahein to, this article provides a detailed analysis of key policy decisions during Donald Trump's presidency, including the Greenland purchase proposal, Gulf of Mexico drilling, WHO withdrawal, and reciprocal tariffs, highlighting their relevance for UPSC aspirants studying international relations and contemporary global issues.

Introduction: Decoding Global Disruptions for UPSC Aspirants

The first hundred days of any new administration, particularly that of a global power like the United States, are often scrutinized for a glimpse into future policy directions. While Donald Trump's presidency brought forth numerous shifts, certain decisions and proposals echoed throughout his term, leaving lasting impacts on international norms and relations. For aspirants preparing for the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) examinations, understanding these complex global events is not just beneficial but essential. These developments often form the bedrock of questions in General Studies papers, particularly concerning International Relations, Indian Economy, and Environmental Governance. This article delves into some of the most talked-about actions and proposals linked to the Trump administration: the idea of purchasing Greenland, policies affecting the Gulf of Mexico, the withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the imposition of reciprocal tariffs. Analyzing these provides a crucial insight into contemporary geopolitics, economic strategies, and the evolving nature of global leadership – all vital for a comprehensive UPSC preparation.

The Greenland Enigma: A Transactional Approach to Geopolitics

One of the more unconventional foreign policy discussions during the Trump era was the reported interest in the United States purchasing Greenland from Denmark. While the idea might have sounded like a historical relic from an era of colonial expansion, it underscored a transactional worldview and highlighted the growing geopolitical significance of the Arctic region. Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, is strategically located and rich in natural resources, which are becoming more accessible due to climate change. President Trump’s alleged interest, confirmed by White House officials, was met with firm dismissal from Danish and Greenlandic authorities, who emphasized that Greenland was not for sale and its people's will was paramount. For UPSC aspirants, this episode is a case study in sovereignty, post-colonial sensitivities, Arctic geopolitics (a region increasingly contested by global powers including Russia and China), and the strategic importance of natural resources. It also raised questions about the methods and motivations behind foreign policy decisions, moving beyond traditional diplomatic frameworks. Understanding the nuances of Arctic council dynamics and resource competition is increasingly relevant.

Gulf of Mexico: Navigating Energy Policy and Environmental Concerns

The Trump administration took significant steps to bolster domestic fossil fuel production, including policies aimed at expanding offshore oil and gas drilling in areas like the Gulf of Mexico. The rationale provided was centered on achieving "energy dominance" for the United States, creating jobs, and reducing reliance on foreign energy sources. This involved attempts to roll back safety regulations implemented after major environmental disasters like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. However, these moves sparked considerable controversy and opposition from environmental groups, coastal communities, and even some state governments, who raised alarms about the potential for increased pollution, damage to marine ecosystems, and the exacerbation of climate change. For UPSC syllabus areas covering environmental conservation, energy security, and sustainable development, this presents a critical point of discussion. It highlights the perpetual conflict between economic development imperatives and environmental protection, a recurring theme in governance and policy-making worldwide. Aspirants should study the long-term ecological and economic impacts of such policies.

The WHO Exit: Implications for Global Health Governance

Perhaps one of the most impactful decisions with immediate global repercussions was the Trump administration's move to formally withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. The reasons cited included allegations of the WHO's mishandling of the pandemic's early stages and its supposed undue influence by China. This decision was met with widespread concern from international leaders, public health experts, and even within the U.S., who argued that it would undermine global efforts to combat the pandemic and other health crises, weaken the WHO, and leave a vacuum in global health leadership. The U.S. had historically been the largest financial contributor to the WHO. For UPSC candidates, this event is a significant topic under "International Organizations" and "Global Health." It prompts an analysis of the effectiveness and challenges of multilateral institutions, the role of major powers in global governance, and the complexities of international cooperation during health emergencies. The subsequent decision by the Biden administration to rejoin the WHO further adds layers to this study. For more updates on international affairs, visit https://asarkari.com.

Reciprocal Tariffs: Reshaping Global Trade Dynamics

A cornerstone of President Trump's economic policy was the "America First" approach, which manifested significantly in trade. The administration imposed tariffs on billions of dollars worth of goods from various countries, most notably China, but also allies like the European Union, Canada, and Mexico, citing unfair trade practices and a desire to protect American industries and jobs. The concept of "reciprocal tariffs" was often invoked, suggesting that the U.S. would match tariffs imposed by other countries on American goods. This led to retaliatory tariffs from affected nations, sparking concerns about trade wars, disruptions to global supply chains, increased costs for consumers, and a potential slowdown in global economic growth. UPSC aspirants need to understand the arguments for and against protectionism versus free trade, the role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in resolving trade disputes, and the impact of such tariff policies on both domestic and international economies. The US-China trade war, for instance, had far-reaching consequences that continue to shape global economic alignments.

Conclusion: Navigating a Complex World for a Better Tomorrow

The policies and proposals discussed – concerning Greenland, the Gulf of Mexico, the WHO, and international trade – represent significant departures from conventional U.S. approaches and have had wide-ranging implications. While the "first 100 days" often signal intent, these issues matured and took definitive shape over the course of the administration, offering critical lessons in international relations, economic policy, environmental stewardship, and global health governance. For UPSC aspirants, dissecting these events is crucial not merely for examination purposes but for developing a nuanced understanding of the forces shaping our contemporary world. The ability to critically analyze such multifaceted issues, identify the motivations behind them, and evaluate their consequences is paramount for future civil servants tasked with navigating an increasingly complex global landscape. Staying informed and analytical is the key to success, both in competitive exams and in contributing to informed public discourse.

Sincerely,
team Asarkari

Keywords